Orange County Church Dumps Building for Houses
The Christian Post fielded an article recently about a church whose membership dwindled to the point where they had to give-up their building and meet in homes.
Here's what they found interesting about meeting in homes:
Most of the offering and tithes go straight to ministry works and service projects rather than to overhead costs and staff salary. Eastburn is the only paid employee in the church.
Also, there are no passive attendees. Everyone participates and the house church has the potential for creating authentic disciples.
"You can go to a conventional church and just sit there. It's much easier to hide," the house church pastor noted. But at house churches, "you can't just sit there for too long."
With budgets getting tighter and many churches being forced to lay-off their staff - more churches may be facing the possibility of losing their buildings. Can homes be a valid alternative.
What do you think are the pros and cons, challenges and benefits of meeting in homes?




